You may think I have gone
bananas, but this is a serious article. It is not often that a banana figures
in an Economics text book. Nor is it often that I buy a banana.
Today, after lunch in office, I
casually picked up a banana from a street vendor nearby to top up my lunch. As
I ate the fruit, my thoughts went back several years ago when, I and a friend of mine used to eat bananas during lunch time everyday, chit-chatting on the footpath, and watching the traffic pass
by. It was 1992 - 93.
Bananas used to cost Rs.2 for
three then. I paid Rs.3 for one today. Back in the evening, I calculated that banana prices have
increased by around 8 % per annum over a period of nearly twenty years. I also find that:
1. Bananas are easy to grow and
cultivated in several parts of the world. Over long periods of time, supply of
bananas is completely elastic.
2.
Bananas are perishable, they must be consumed as soon as they are produced (at
least, within a reasonable period of time). It is not possible to hoard
bananas, create artificial shortage and jack up prices. Bananas are not
bought as an “investment”.
3. Hedge funds do not buy bananas, nor
are bananas traded on commodity exchanges. There are no Exchange Traded Funds
(ETFs) who invest in bananas. You cannot buy bananas “on the margin”. There is no speculative demand for bananas.
4. There are no banks
who offer “loans for buying bananas”, which can create artificial demand and
cause price bubbles.
5. The
demand for bananas does not fluctuate much with economic cycles of boom and bust. Demand
can be said to be in a “steady state”, growing “normally” along with the growth
in population. I don’t think per capita consumption of bananas has changed much
in the last twenty years due to cultural shifts, eating habits or other
such reasons.
6. Prices of bananas are not regulated. There is no MSP (Minimum Support Price) or government subsidy
either to banana sellers or buyers which distorts price discovery.
7. A banana cannot be
said to be the country’s “staple diet”, unlike say rice or wheat. If prices
rise more than expected, people will stop eating them, bringing the prices down
again. If prices fall too much, banana growers will grow something else, reducing supply which will bring prices up again.
In other words, this
is a classic case of what economists call the “long run equilibrium” where prices are determined by free
forces of demand and supply, over long periods of time. There are no disruptions.
And yet, banana prices have
increased at a rate of 8 percent per annum over the last two decades.
Firstly, this rate (around 8 % p.a.) can be
taken as the long run rate of currency depreciation for the Indian Rupee. Price of banana has actually remained the same, but the currency has lost its value. Price of every other natural resource can also be expected to rise at a rate of at least 8 % per annum in the long run.
Secondly, prices of natural resources where such an ideal state does not exist (a condition contrary to any point mentioned in 1-7 above exists) can be expected to increase at a rate more than 8 % per annum in the long run. Note that almost all the factors mentioned
above influence price upwards, by either increasing demand or reducing supply.
And last but not the least, even monkeys can teach economics.
And last but not the least, even monkeys can teach economics.
No comments:
Post a Comment